I prefer to remain factual. I completely disagree. Bitcoin should no longer be associated with fiat at all, which is why I find this comparison inappropriate. The idea of keys is intriguing, but even in this aspect, there are projects initiated to ensure nothing is lost in case of a user's passing, although I personally distance myself from them. And who had a lot of Bitcoin in the past? Very few people bought Bitcoin for a few dollars and held onto it until now. The whales invested millions. I can't explain everything here as it would exceed the scope, but if you delve into mining and difficulty, as well as the effects of halving, you will realize that the price of Bitcoin will rise significantly, and we are still at the beginning.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> I prefer to remain factual. I completely disagree. Bitcoin should no longer be associated with fiat at all

You "prefer to remain factual" but can't come to terms with the fact that bitcoin's value derives solely from its price on the stock market, and nobody in the real world, aside from a few novelty cases that you people like to tout nonstop, uses it for anything other than investment.

And another snide "I can't explain it but trust me bro!"

And then you appeal to the "price of bitcoin" once again without realizing that such a phrase makes so sense without bringing dollars into the picture for comparison (i.e., price of bitcoin in WHAT?).

Pathetic.

Yes because after the smartest minds on Earth have looked at Bitcoin. You, victor from Nostr, will be the one to break Bitcoin. Get off your high horse