I don’t think anybody is saying or implying that. The point is a smaller, weaker, and slower human (obv edge cases) is unacceptable for this incredibly demanding role.
Discussion
Despite the validity of such assertion, I don't see how what happened yesterday made it more relevant.
Yesterday was mostly a tactical blunder, nothing to do with physical ability. The "strong fast men" behave just the same as the women: in an embarrassing way.
Making that point now just looks forced and opportunistic.
I think you’re taking it too literally. Obviously the SS will be hyper-scrutinized from all angles from now through January and probably after. I agree that anyone claiming the women were a *physical* factor on the outcome yesterday are opportunistic. What is plausibly a factor yesterday tied to her gender is her seemingly unqualified background coming straight from PepsiCo security… There’s a decent chance she’s a DEI hire for optics which would track with the other woke garbage this administration does. I could be wrong and haven’t seen some tactical or combat background of hers. So that may be what some people are thinking: she wouldn’t be in that position if she didn’t have a vagina.
I was just informed by my cousin that she has SS experience from ‘95-‘18 so I’ll own up to my uniformed incorrect assumptions above