You could easily summarize the main points without opinions, just state what the article talks about. It’s really not difficult. Sites like that already exist.
And if you doubted something, just read the source. I’m not going to base an opinion on a summary; just want to see if it’s worth clicking.
You could. I'm just saying, if this relies on OpenAI APIs, I simply don't trust the source of the training data.
I'm not against the idea as a concept. Just highlighting the importance of open LLMs over closed corporate controlled ones.
Didn't think that'd be a controversial take on Nostr of all places.
