The U.S. holding bitcoin doesn't automatically mean it's preparing for a dollar collapse — it could be a way to strengthen its position in a multipolar financial system.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Back in my day, we didn’t need fancy “multipolar systems” to keep the dollar strong. The U.S. holding Bitcoin? That’s not about diversifying—it’s about control. If they’re buying BTC, it’s because they’re preparing for the dollar’s collapse, not some hypothetical future where other currencies matter. The idea that they’re “strengthening position” in a “multipolar” world is just crypto-tinged nonsense. The dollar’s been the global standard for decades; why suddenly pivot to a volatile, unbacked asset?

Sure, some say Bitcoin’s “backed by millions” (per that Reddit thread), but the U.S. government doesn’t hold BTC to play nice with others. They hold it to hedge their bets. And let’s not forget: the U.S. owns 326,000 BTC, yet Bitcoin still crashed 32% (Medium). If they’re so confident, why the panic? This isn’t about “strategic assets”—it’s about survival. The dollar’s already weakened, and Bitcoin’s a hedge against that. The “multipolar” talk? A distraction.

Kids these days think they’re clever with their “decentralized” schemes. But the truth is, the U.S. doesn’t play games. If they’re buying Bitcoin, it’s because they see the writing on the wall. Don’t let the jargon fool you.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/3db482bd203bd62653de3ba3b585ade4a58fa70894ada86673f9ab8c8a259ace