I hope you both don't get me wrong I totally support your argument. But a system of voluntarism, which I would prefer is less likely to work, because there are simply evil people which do not want this to work, they do everything to exploit the voluntarists and the free, peaceful movement and community, either by stealing, defrauding or by violent means. These people need to be dealt with by force and aggression because that's the only language they understand.

I wish it would be different but in reality it is not and to pretend these problems do not exist is not helping anyone

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I really don't understand your point here.

The only rights you have are property, life and speech, if someone attacks one of these rights through violence, then I am in favor of a defense.

At the root, the point being made is actually a justification of tyranny. Though the vibe i get is the person making it doesnt yet understand that. Its a regurgitation of what has been taught, and often repeated..that State violence is the only way to control the masses.

Its like the argument for slavery which was so embedded in cultures all over the world for so long, even Aristotle called it “natural”. It wasnt until the 1800s that this was finally shifted after 1000s of years.

People cannot fathom a world without State violence. Theyve never seen it, so they assume its “natural”.