It seems that it IS open source (and therefore also non custodial).

nostr:nevent1qqsgu7pl536rq5yludn4ftp0vclzcqdplzudga3dt5lz2epvn8xnl9sppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5pzpwjq4yvhmhzv7t5sp045a339pycr84u2tk95p70y6p6k7ngu4qexqvzqqqqqqy8lfdc4

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Open source is not the same as non custodial. For example there's custodial elements in many open source bitcoin wallets.

I agree, but if a wallet is not open source it cannot be non-custodial.

Yes it can. For example there's many wallets that haven't released their source code but still allows users to create and hodl their own keys and self custody.

Of course I would not recommend trusting any of those wallets.

Technically thats true. In my mind if I have to trust a software to not send the seed to someone I see it as custodial.