Data storage on bitcoin is.. whatever? Pay miners.

Introduction of MEV is a *huge* issue.

As we’ve seen with ETH both pre- and post-PoS MEV creates intense centralization pressure that would all but defeat the purpose of bitcoin. Luckily there’s no excuse for introducing MEV - any system you design which does introduce it can ~always be designed to avoid the introduction of MEV. While people play around with systems built on top of Bitcoin it’s important to suggest MEV-avoiding alternatives and discourage use of MEV-introducing systems.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

is this about rollkit?

personally it makes no sense to me how that could introduce MEV

Yeah the concern seems a bit overblown tbf

what’s the intuition- all the MEV would be via the sequencer and i assume you can’t actually affect ordering of the roll-up settlement onto btc anyway

As long as it’s via a sequencer, it doesn’t introduce MEV on bitcoin, which is totally fine! That’s one of many ways to design systems that use bitcoin without actually introducing MEV, which is great. There are other projects folks have been talking about which introduce material MEV.

but how?

idk how you could ever do anything material if the assets don’t exist on btc’s blockchain itself

Well the rollout folks apparently have such an option - just letting people transact on the bitcoin chain and using that to determine higher-level tx ordering.

Err rollkit

fair enough i must not get rollkit yet kek

To be fair, I only learned this after I opened an issue in their GitHub and they responded :)

does that mean that we'll never be able to build trustless briges?.. SPV proofs , OPCodes to read zkproofs etc?

I don’t think so, you can have those things in a way that doesn’t create MEV. Eg after-the-fact ordering with block hashes.

Ok I hope we come to a point were we agree on certain upgrades without those risks but at least we come to some agreements so we move forward 👍