Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Ross

Glad this is staying a civil but spirited debate because it's an interesting philosophical argument.

On one hand people shouldn't expect privacy in a public space, that is true both online and offline. If however, in physical space I followed you around 24/7 and provided commentary on every comment you made, you would want to punch me in the face.

For a moment let's set aside the technical responses such as: encrypt your messages, or run your own private relay. That kinda defeats the purpose of participating in a public network.

So, is the act of someone programatically categorizing your content a form of harassment? Would providing an opt out mechanism satisfy both parties?

Avatar
Jac 1y ago

I think my opinion is that unfortunately anonymity and a complete lack of censorship always results in undesirable content persisting. A person can have no censorship if there is forced personal accountability for content that is subject to community dissent and law enforcement. If there is anonymity, there must be centralized censorship to moderate content for the platform to remain civilized.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.