Parsing the text etc might be dumbe and BlueSky would have an easier job with their set up probably.
But this is exactly what is done in Nostr Wikis already. So what the case against having links like that in general?
Discussion
you are talking about, essentially, a URL right?
so, yeah, noh. wikilink is not better than a good old W3C standard spec URL
wikkilink assumes the consistency of a distributed store of data. we don't have that guarantee yet. nostr or similar protocols could create such a guarantee ... if there was a replication strategy baked into it.
making a standard nostr URL would be what you are thinking of. something that binds to a static, and permanent event ID, that is retained in order to create a history of edits. that's a lot of assumptions and a lot of protocols that don't exist yet.
Nope, I'm talking about a wiki id (which is more like a hashtag)
you don't know the logistics of what you speak of
at minimum it has to have a 256 bit hash as part of it, to not collide with another document