Replying to Avatar less

I generally despise politics and am neither a Republican or Democrat, but somebody needs to lay it out:

A Revolution--likely violent--is coming soon.

Income inequality in the US--and around the world--is reaching catastrophic proportions.

History says that this discrepancy in income and living standards is strongly correlated with Revolutions... usually bloody.

If the Ruling Elite and Billionaire Class don't address this developing situation with practical solutions in the near-term, then (I predict, based on historical precedent) that this will NOT end well for said Elites.

The current monetary and financial system has reached a breaking point and, if it is not proactively fixed, it will eventually be overthrown.

One clear example of the obnoxious and increasingly intolerable inequality is in the CEO-to-Worker compensation ratio (see graph).

Hope in the future of America is fading... and many lower income Americans are growing desperate.

In light of this and many other large (and widening) discrepancies, here are Five Fixes for the Ruling Elite and Billionaire Class to strongly consider (and quickly implement):

1. C-suite executives at all public and private US companies should immediately institute policies to lower their compensation packages and/or raise their Workers' compensation packages, in order to reach a CEO-to-Worker ratio of 30-to-1, or less.

2. Though long considered "untouchable," Social Security needs to be intelligently adjusted. I know many wealthy American seniors who neither need nor even want to receive Social Security payments, and would actually be relieved if their payments went instead to their fellow Americans who are suffering financially. -- SOLUTION: Immediately phase-out Social Security payments to senior Americans in the highest income deciles and transfer these same payments to younger Americans in the lowest income deciles.

3. A progressive (income-based) student debt jubilee. -- While I believe strongly in general debt repayment obligations, many recent college graduates are straddled with large levels of debt while available jobs are vanishing. Negative income and a negative net worth cannot be survived for long, as even basic food and shelter needs become out of reach. This becomes an impossible situation to navigate... eventually leading to desperate (likely violent) actions. -- Such hopelessness and aggression are already manifest in high and rising rates of drug and alcohol usage, riots, suicide, and homicide.

4. Disincentivize ownership of multiple homes. -- Many younger Americans are simply priced out of home ownership, while many older Americans own two or more homes. This discrepancy is increasingly insufferable to younger Americans. -- SOLUTION: Americans can easily be disincentivized to own more than one home through tax policy. Doing so would cause many older Americans to try to sell their additional homes, increasing market supply, and decreasing prices to a reasonable level.

5. Increase the progressive Death Tax for the ultra-wealthy. -- Allow entrepreneurial Billionaires and (soon) Trillionaires to enjoy the fruits of their labors while they are alive, but then let the living standards of all Americans be raised upon their passing. Multi-generational family dynasties are over-rated and generally unproductive. -- SOLUTION: Directly transfer progressive Death Tax proceeds to lower income Americans. Make these transfer payments open-source, so everyone can watch the benefits of the inventive and industrious citizens accrue to all Americans.

--------

Finally, I believe that the coming Age of AI and Robotics will only accelerate the above-mentioned trends and accentuate the need for shrewd and well-timed solutions.

It is time for the Ruling Elite and Billionaire Class to act while they still can, or (as history shows) the Worker Class will rise up and do the dirty work for them.

Sorry mate, I don't think you can tax your way out of socialism.

Wealth inequality may be a sign of tyranny but it is also a hallmark of actual, real capitalism, unlike the interventionist crony-capitalism we see around the world.

The difference is that in free-market capitalism, although vastly poorer than the richest people in society, the least wealthy still have enough to make a living, maybe even a decent one, whereas in a tyrannical, socialist system, the poor have so very little that the very thought of continuing to live seems like a cruel joke.

You suggest centralized, violent expropriation of those that have, rightfully or unrightfully, gained wealth and transfer it to those who have less, which is exactly what the current systems are based on, in other words, more of the same.

Also, you completely leave out the role of government in all of this misery, the unlimited inflation of the money supply since 1971 which automatically nominally enriches all holders of assets while expropriating holders of cash and bank balances, as well as Cantillon effects enriching the politically connected to the detriment of those who can't employ lobbyists.

I commend your taking the time to ponder solutions but, like any good doctor, you must look much deeper than simply to counteracting symptoms and find the real, actual cause of the disease wracking society as we now it.

And just to be clear, I also have no interest in any form of wide-spread violence or "class warfare". I'm also poor myself so I have no interest in continuing the status quo.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

What violency is he advocating for? He's just arguing for more open UBI like redistribution models and that the wealthy will want more of that. Which they already do. The really wealthy people don't think in ideology, they think in risk analysis.

And also one doesn't know the actual numbers is advocating for, this would target the very wealthy.

The thing is, there's a real risk that socialism comes back.

What Dr. Jeff is arguing for is a middle way, pragmatic and innovative solution to avoid precisely that.

The State already exists, the state already forces you to pay taxes, we don't need to pretend as if that wasn't the case.