It seems in the miners’ interests to overwhelmingly support #Bip300 as the activity on #drivechain will generate additional revenue for them.

However, could we see a scenario where a substantial share of the hashpower would not support Bip 300?

This scenario may play out if some large mining farms are institutionally owned. I think governments wouldn’t want to see drivechain on the #Bitcoin network because those could confer more #privacy to #BTC holders.

Hence, those government-control farms may attempt to fork the network to push away the threat that drivechains represent while « stealing » the Bitcoin brand. It’s not difficult to imagine which side #BlackRock would support…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yes. If its not Liquid pushing anti-drivechain fud, i think it may be governments.

If it's governments then that means two scary things:

1. They have an active and orange pilled dis-information online presence. Meaning an office dedicated to observing and destroying bitcoin in any way possible, even minor things like this.

2. Every country in the world might have some group dedicated to this.

We know they are using automated tools for misinformation, argus