I’m curious how you arrive at the consequent of “more impact” from the antecedent of “costs more” or “lower market demand”.

Not disagreeing necessarily, but I don’t see why one necessitates the other.

Both the “if” and the “then” may be true (or not), but why is it an “if A, then B” statement?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.