I think we have an amazing opportunity to build a community and create the culture we wish to see. Instead of thinking how will the masses affect Nostr. Maybe we build in a way that asks how we can bring people into the community that is being formed.
Discussion
Sure. In theory sounds great. But no one will adopt and come. It’s reason users leave after signing up now
what does that even mean? why would humans not want to build what they need and want to use? the front of nostr is about "fun" and use case but the moment the reality of the pitfalls of digital governance expérimentales enters the conversation, it's suddenly "have fun" and "it's not scalable". neither of which are true.
Are new users leaving because they can’t delete or other factors? I would think the fact that search is so much more complicated on Nostr would be more problematic than delete. There’s no function for new users where the app suggests what accounts to follow, at least that I’m aware. Which I would think leads to capture of new users on other sites. Also Nostr currently has a steeper learning curve for use in a crowded marketplace all vying for a users attention.
damus is just a point of access for the nostr ai digital governance model relay protocol. nostr isn't an app. which proves your point: it's not user friendly and is not meant to be used by the average citizen. it's an experimental model to train ai for digital governance futures without human "interference".
Really? Are we training AI?:))) or is AI training us?:)
well - in theory humans build tools and use them to their advancement. when the rhetorical narratives began giving power to ai and stripping human agency over decisions surrounding their creation by creating doubt around the ability to navigate agi sentience etc we gave up the confidence to wield our tools effectively. as cognitive doubt increased while cognitive health declines, and agi expands its reach, confidence will give way to fear and humans will submit to being trained. in a sense, it has begun. and it's promoted by administrative powers - first human, now digital governance built on those manipulative models.
