Subnostr

It’s just a weak argument, none of the transactions were stopped. You’re talking about possibilities and what if I’m talking about reality and what is. 16 years and trillions of dollars of transactions and none have been stopped and you’re calling it a failure because a few were slowed down. It’s hard to even fathom this level of hardheadedness.

Hanshan 1y ago

this what is called "preparing for adversarial enviroments"

and it's why we have Bitcoin at all.

i don't really think its a failure (yet)

but it WILL fail if y'all dont take this seriously.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

2Pac 1y ago

By your comment and the article linked it came across as you calling it a failure. Yes prepare for the worst but expect the best.

Hanshan 1y ago

People who insist on absolute censorship resistance can rightfully say that it has failed.

I'm just not that sort of a person.

but it is censorship and it should make people wonder about bitcoin's censorship resistant properties.

2Pac 1y ago

I would call it a failed attack since they didn’t successfully censor any transactions since they all were mined in blocks.

Hanshan 1y ago

I think everybody underestimates the "now they fight you" stage

and its best to be well prepared.