When you say getting rugged, what do you mean? Incoming [likely] over-regulation and FinCEN stuff?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nah force closes during high fees.

Seeing multiple people opened 1m sat channels get forced closed for 500k fee over the last few days.

Having a hard time recommending people setup their own nodes given this

Ahh. That’s really rough. So is there a situation where if fees get high enough a channel can force-close as a result of something contractual?

Or is it more that the unfortunately-timed force close just hurts extra bad when fees are high?

I'm not sure about that. Clearly I have a lot to learn!

I made a critical mistake last night while hardening my home network and inadvertently blocked necessary routing through my node with a dumb firewall rule. I didn't catch it and htlc's were stuck while I slept. My node broadcasted a force close commitment. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

Learning a lot today! Certain lengths - or degrees - of downtime (but not others?) will cause a force close?

Sorry for your loss of sats πŸ«‚

What I learned/surmised yesterday happened in a whirlwind, so the details aren't quite clear to me yet.

> Node fine, no issues

> apply newly learned firewall rules, go to sleep

> wake up, see force close

> panic

> firewall logs show blocked IP's to node while sleep

> nuke firewall rules

The particular network firewall rule was 'Drop invalid state', which I don't fully understand and blindly applied as part of an overall hardening guide.

So, to attempt answering your question given my limited knowledge:

An offline node doesn't seem to cause anything to get stuck, but an online node with broken LAN routing appears to be a real issue.

Perhaps my node appeared as viable in the graph, accepted an htlc, but threw it in the fuckin trash? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

What I just said doesn't quite add up to me, because I'm wondering why my own node would broadcast a force close if it was in fact the 'bad actor'. I was under the impression that other nodes in the route would force close as a result of my node not 'playing fairly'.

All I know is the only variable out of place here is that LAN firewall rule.