I think you are onto something: When posts and follows are organized by author, authors are incentivized to use eye-grabbing rhetoric, to provoke adrenaline and make people want more, and to get more: More likes! More followers!

When posts are organized by topic, contributors can speak freely, but there is less incentive for authors to seek followers through rhetoric, and more incentive to gain community respect by providing useful perspective.

Not that the latter can’t happen on author-organized services, but the incentives seem to distract from it. The author-focused services feel noisier and frenetic or schizophrenic, while the subject-focused services feel more focused and useful.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Second zap ever! Thank you nostr:nprofile1qqs8umusrrg2kscmwhevdsfrhlkv7kc0npfkqd7wvx3u6qu956ameegpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuen0w4h8gctfdchxvmgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduau84f3. See my dopamine flow? Just like likes on twitter. Though I think the fact that zaps are money does change the incentive structure on Nostr. I suspect it pushes authors toward utility and other value (like humor) over pure adrenaline goosing attention grabs.