If the reason for requiring a phone number to use your service is spam prevention, why not add a secondary option that charges PoW or sats?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not having a phone number is the way

Thanks for sharing that.

Because most people don’t know what that means

But then they can't sell your data 😅

A planetary brain needs an energy language for its neurons to spark powerful thoughts.

How about…

A system where you have to pay sats to use a 2FA, reset your password, or submit a password.

The catch is the sats go to your account wallet. So no harm if it’s you, as you’re paying yourself.

But bad actors won’t because of the cost of attempted log-in or attack.

Signal 👀... It would also probably cost a lot less for the infrastruture.