35mm film.
Exposure compensation
A little underexposed?😅
#photography 
Discussion
Nice!
ASA? Camera/lens?
Probably ASA.
Because I used 125.
yes you should have used 400, it's more sensitive
It is interesting to see how film photography changes with ASA.
yeah, exposure/aperture and dynamic range and grain all have their place in a great photo, it takes a lot of practice to get good photos consistently
you can do a lot of the same thing with digital too but it's not quite got the same "warmth" as the analog tech - sample aliasing in digital signal capture is hard to remove without absurd resolution, nyquist said 2x but honestly i think 8x to get a clean image/sound
I'll get some experience.
it's the type of film too, that is a too-short exposure for that type of film, to make it look good you need to take it from a tripod and give it a second or so to give a full dynamic range
It seems it was. Thanks for the advice.👍
yes, i should also mention, with a smaller aperture to compensate for the longer exposure
that will also change your depth of field so it affects a lot of things
i'm no expert on this but my mother did a lot of photography and she taught me many of the things as she was learning them
film photography is an expensive hobby though, but i'm sure you realise this
