Also, I don't feel like that Ben Franklin quote is particularly applicable here. If Bitcoin were outlawed, people who choose family over code aren't choosing safety above freedom, they're choosing to live for their loved ones rather than gamble on buying something that is easily trackable, oj the off chance that hodling will fix the issue in their lifetime.

Honestly, I'm not sure what the argument would be for using Bitcoin over privacy coins in a situation like that. I guess that's one of the main arguments I'm making here, if you boil things down.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Bitcoin won’t help you break the law if that’s what you mean. You’ll have to move to a more favorable jurisdiction or give up capital gains entirely. Monero wins you privacy, but not much more wealth than just using fiat.

Hmm yeah, that's what I was assuming. So, in other words, if someone can't/doesn't want to pack up everything and leave their home for Bitcoin if it becomes actively targeted, they shouldnt bother unless the law protects Bitcoin use, yes?

You could pledge allegiance to your local mafia, but yeah for normies it be over in that part of the world.

do U have a local mafia?

It’s basically just our government 😇 the perks of being a tiny country. Doing any business you soon know everyone

where if U care 2 share?

I’m not hard to doxx 😀 Google might tell you. An undisclosed eastern european country with all the leet hackers