I don't think you know what I am saying. The current and recent quantum announcements have been "Quantum benchmarks" which is literally esoteric to the quantum field. Meaning it has no actually computational logic. It just turns on and off and is on and off simultaneously to create existence feedback. NONE of that has any application in computation. This is the equivalent to being able to activate/deactivate a light a faster speed than thought possible. While, very cool, has no application yet. How do you register the light? What carries the signal? How does it interoperate with current tech? What's the latency? All of these questions are far from answered. But realistically if quantum computing becomes viable the first thing it does is mine bitcoin, not try to break it.
Discussion
I’m not saying the first thing it will do is break bitcoin. I’m saying it will break encryption. So we should make things quantum resistant in advance
If it breaks encryption, the internet itself breaks. That's what I'm saying. This is like saying "If you shoot me and the bullet goes through me and hits my window, I'll have to buy a new window!"
My point is that it will do exactly that. Every system will be made quantum resistant before that happens.
This is like using an older encryption algorithm and just acting like it will never be broken because if it was, then all systems built on it would break. That’s not what happened, the older algorithms were broken, and better ones replaced them.
It’s only a matter of time until quantum computing does this. Whether or not that is within our lifetimes is irrelevant.