This looks even worse than the Rufo/Yarvin debate. Why bother having two blowhards argue about which form of sound money is sounder? Why not chuck in a social credit advocate to make things interesting.
The #Gold vs #Bitcoin Debate with Erik Voorhees and Peter Schiff https://video.nostr.build/d1b880994532b17e735fb20e4fd38853cb4428f33b7d52482c775109d0af3b2d.mp4
Discussion
By "social credit", I mean Major C.H Douglas, not the silly fairy stories about the Chinese surveillance state designed to distract you from what your phone is doing RIGHT NOW.
There's a zizek & nick land debate on the cards, apparently, potentially, maybe.
That could be interesting
Is Zizek a cokehead? He always sniffles like he just ripped a giant line. While Land just likes to ramble like he ate a bottle of finest amphetamines. The debate is like epic battle of history between sneachta and ice.
I'd love to think Zizek is a cokehead and I'm going to tell people it's true even if it's not.
Perhaps he is but he exaggerates to hide in plain sight. Philosophy is useful, eh?
It would certainly explain a lot if he was.
We need to get him to join us here. Is he on Twitter?
He'll have an alt on Twatter so he can pretend to be above it all.
Fuck him then, we get Land
That'd be hilarious
someone has tried to get land to join nostr lol
well, they mentioned nostr to him at least
He sniffs lines of premium Critical Theory!