Nostr

There seems to be a couple of problems. I am in favour of a user muting and blocking content they don't want to see. I am not in favour of that affecting what I see. It seems they can only do this by reporting as spam/offensive, so it may not even be the blocker's fault, they are just choosing within a limited option and terminology. They can also be doing nothing avtually wrong.

Frank "RICO" Blunt 2y ago

the point is we can choose if we want to use anothers mutes,reports,etc

nostr is about choice, and that includes letting groups censor together, fact is without very effective curation nostr will be quickly over run with spam and people wont use it over bigtech, if we want to defeat bigtech we must do everything better, including moderation

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

7fqx 2y ago

I think my gripe is simply a lack of separation between reporting spam and muting. Reporting spam is useful across groups, I agree. But not so good with a mute list of genuine users, where muting is done for any number of personal/political disagreements.

Frank "RICO" Blunt 2y ago

if you dont want the delegated muting to be political then you will need to find people that wont do that, me personally i only would only mute real spam but i think reacts like spam, bot, retard would be useful

7fqx 2y ago

That sort of relies on telepathy tho lol;)