I really like this approach. this does not cover any standardization about what "type" the field is. but maybe thats a good thing?
nostr:nprofile1qqsqgc0uhmxycvm5gwvn944c7yfxnnxm0nyh8tt62zhrvtd3xkj8fhgprdmhxue69uhkwmr9v9ek7mnpw3hhytnyv4mz7un9d3shjqgcwaehxw309ahx7umywf5hvefwv9c8qtmjv4kxz7gpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7s3al0v has the best suggestion to approach profile fields imo
Make the spec allow users to define their own fields instead of attempting to standardize them
https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1592#issuecomment-2488744571
Discussion
No replies yet.