Replying to Avatar ₿eau ₿

I think you should avoid working with socialist collectivists. Collaborating with evil even in a pragmatic way, only strengthens the evil, we should not be supporting or working with those who use force and fraud to steal the wealth of innocent productive people. No matter the proclaimed “noble goals”. I completely disagree with your approach and think it will only strengthen the evil that is the current state of the UK government.
Avatar
Susie Violet 5mo ago

Attending the Labour Party Conference doesn’t mean you endorse the party or the state. It’s about engaging across the political spectrum to educate, not advocate.

Bitcoin Policy UK isn’t representing the UK government, and it’s certainly not making decisions on behalf of others...that would be authoritarian.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
₿eau ₿ 5mo ago

Thank you for your reply, i appreciate the dialogue. I understand there is a delicate line between endorsement and education. I just wouldn’t want to aid the labour party in anything they want to do. Because everything they want to do requires more coercion and less freedom. Whilst I would like the government to recognise bitcoin, bitcoin is inherently free market capitalist by it’s nature. I don’t want the labour party to reap the benefits of a system produced by productive people, but i guess it could work to undermine their power as bitcoin is anti authoritarian by nature. Which socialist countries have had a positive approach to bitcoin so far? I’d be interested to know.