https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1585

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This still needs updating though, the latest version is in the no-dns repo

hm nodns needs to sit on top of an conventional Resolver like Bind and handover nameresolution when it can't . a more human readable version for a Nostr domain would be handy

This solution can't solve the human readable part. It chooses security and decentralization over human-readable.

I believe the human readable names to be a social problem to solve. They could perfectly well resolve to an npub's no-dns records. Meaning bob.nostr might resolve to one npub for me and a different one for you based on our differing social graph.

hm that doesn't work , the name must be worldwide unique like a npub

I disagree

For uniqueness you either need to agree on a centralized authority like ICANN.

OR

Achieve global consensus by adding it to the Bitcoin blockchain. But to me, that seems expensive and unattainable for most people in the future.

I don't like either of the former solutions. I think accepting that no globally unique owner of [short name].nostr and building for that is more realistic. You can give a name weight by putting PoW towards it or by social consensus, which is how the world has operated since forever and it works quite wel... If I say 'London', you probably know what I'm talking about and which coordinates it belongs to, despite there being multiple London's out there