Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

I used to believe in political incrementalism- the idea that you can change things gradually through better election outcomes.

But maybe it was also just youth, I don’t know.

After spending many years studying how the current monetary system works, studying how past debt and currency cycles ended, and based on practical realities from the past two election cycles, I dropped any notion of incrementalism, at least for the big economic things.

Incrementalism works for minority groups to gain social and political rights. Religious people to practice without interference, women to vote, gay people to marry, etc. Immigration policies. Things like that. But it doesn’t work for the financial system.

Instead, history and current affairs suggest that things generally point in the same structural financial direction, uncontested, until there is a massive fiscal crisis, geopolitical crisis, and trend change. And that is when politics becomes critical in all aspects- as chaos develops, the group that has enough power to set the next order *really* fucking matters. They either build a platform of virtue toward the next cycle, or they fall into the unfortunately common paths of communism or fascism.

And it is not just ideas that triumph, but technology too. Technology plays a big role in which ideas are even workable. Both ideas and technology are important.

So when I realized incrementalism wasn’t working, I sought out other methods.

The weaker method is just social- I try to put things out there with my platform to encourage reason, empathy, human rights, etc. Not partisan but also not necessarily moderate, but rather grounded in firm principles of virtue ethics.

The stronger method is to play some small part in building something better. Alternative money. Alternative communication methods. Either explaining and recommending them to people, or directly venture investing in companies that build on them and help improve the UX and solve new problems.

That’s my goal. I want to do whatever tiny part I can to bring about more peace, more fairness, more opportunity, more growth, and less destruction.

in other words incrementalism ( voting ) only works when you vote for what the Jews in power tell you to vote for.

if the Jews tell you to vote for mass 3rd world immigration and you vote for it - then you will get it.

but good luck trying to vote International Finance Jewry out of global power ...

Klaus Schwab isn't going to put himself on a ballot so you could vote against him.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

cant believe you muted me lol

i don't currently have you muted though i had you muted in the past.

i don't remember why.

i spoke about christian stuff

probably. because arguing with faith is a waste of time. belief isn't subject to logical arguments.

Argues doesn’t understand yet goes regurgitation on what you said?

How does that compute?!

Faith? Where? Doesn’t know how?

But I’m sure the chairwhore doesn’t have anything to do with the deviants.

i doubt human memory has any special process variance between belief and scientific knowledge, such that both are the same in the head

i think everything is subject to logic, logic applied to religion is quite good, infact there is a science to religion and science is a religion especially in pandemic method aka church of the holy vax

why do you think most philosophers were rich ? because you can only think about the nebulous stuff AFTER all your immediate needs are met. poor people think like animals because they face the same issues as animals face - such has starvation.

a religious person is also like an animal because their "soul" is under constant threat ( of going to hell ) so like an animal or a peasant they are in survival mode. they don't have the luxury of thinking.

but if you give up on your soul like an atheist, or on material things like Diogenes, then you are free to think.

as Mike Tyson said - everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face. what this means is that you can't fight in survival mode and also think at the same time.

you have to give up all hope ( both for this life and the afterlife ) and become a total Gooner like me and then and only then can you be a great philosopher !

needs, desires, fears - these things cloud our vision.

only a person who has let go of everything can think clearly.

of course such a person cannot function, so it is not realistic to ask of anybody.

you just need to recognize that you will never be a great philosopher like me because of these reasons and simply accept that your ideas will never be of much value, compared to mine, but in exchange for that you might get to enjoy your life with all its meaningless goals and false hopes and so on.

genetics would say more about the rich being rich, having time to and thinking

i think you over generalize the religious as you will find many a thinker among them

one might embrace a path to hell, goon as such, but religion has more to offer especially if you ignore pure dogma and balance it with logic

nothing is sadder than people trying to balance religion with reason.

either go all-in like an Islamic Terrorist throwing Gays off the roof tops or accept that it's all BS and jerk off to Tranny Porn.

trying to balance the two is the most idiotic idea i have ever heard.

either you think or you believe.

you can't be half pregnant.

You’ll know when you understand.

Don’t think.

🤙🏻

you can be halfway thru a pregnancy

at some point thoughts become beliefs or the 2 interact

religous people do think, religious technology certainly affects thought and obviously belief

i like you have strong opinions, why i was a bit sad over the mute lol

epic kek!

Bitcoin is hurtling in from left field and undermining the incumbent elite power base to the extent some are already converting/taking out insurance (BlackRock ETF).

No vote or permission will be granted, but none is required. We are in the middle of a revolution.

That said, I still can’t buy a coffee in Sats where I live.