This touches indeed on the most basic questions...

But, isn't all you're saying there the opposite of proof of work?

You: "faster"

I: Is that 'better'? Why?

You: "more convemient"

I: convenience kills us (in every possible sense, really)

You: "more accurate"

I: (supposingly) "more accurate" but acording to what? As itteration, as confirmation bias, in order to get to an unknown spot; there is no accuration, I guess, there is hard work and indeed a bit of "birth pain", I suppose

As I said, the digital is crucial, for exchanging, distribution, decentralization... all sorts of sh...

but all that needs a 'material base/ foundation'...

Hui, I'll really end up 'internalizing bitcoin as base layer 'good object' here"💟

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Faster, when conserving the same outcome value of course, is always better, because time is all we have. We only live in three dimensions & time is the most important currency for every mortal.

Wasting more time for something that requires less, is literally cutting your life that amount of time shorter.

If all that wasn't tough enough, nobody knows how much time each one has left. It might be over tomorrow.

Convenience means less stress, more wellness, which leads to a healthier & better life.

Im not advocating for #Google products, because they are convenient. You can also be convenient & still live healthily, without compromising standards.

Not sure what "biased" accuracy you refer to, but if I'm searching for how often a specific word was mentioned in a PDF, I just CTRL+F it & get the number.

You would need a huge amount of time to achieve the same in this super simple task.

Only the computers everything runs on & #VirtualReality equipment need to be material. Everything else can be digital.