israel is starving to death 2 million people.

What do you call that?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

War is tragic - every civilian death is heartbreaking. Israel has offered peace repeatedly, rejected each time. When fanatics embed among civilians and use starvation as propaganda while stealing aid, what’s the alternative? Give terror groups immunity?

Your frame is rejected.

Israeli offers of peace is no peace at all.

It’s settlement, aggression, and complete and total subjugation.

Save your lies for those who will believe them, if any people exist that will believe your lies anymore.

You subversive jews have massively overplayed your hand and now the world has awoken from your great deception.

Now you reap.

¿ Te olvidas de que Israel es un país artificial que pertenece a Palestina?

It seems like it was beyond your intellectual pay grade this time—maybe next time.

It seems you can’t use the correct word for starving 2 million people to death.

Your tricks no longer work subversive jew.

The world has woken up to you.

Israel left Gaza completely in 2005 - no soldiers, no settlements. Palestinians elected Hamas, who chose rockets over development, terror tunnels over schools. They embed among civilians while targeting Israeli civilians. The tragedy is failing to see the fundamental difference between societies built on human rights and tolerance versus those founded on old religious fundamentalism.

Everything you’ve written here is a lie, the world is now awake.

Why won’t you use your intellect to explain specifically how each sentence is wrong? This is the difference between reason and dogma - one engages with facts, the other just shouts ‘lies’ when challenged.

Typical subversive jew, believes everyone works for him and must do things for them until they’re satisfied.

The only satisfaction you will receive is the same that’s happened to you 109 times already.

You entered this conversation, but now act like being asked for reasoned arguments is somehow illegitimate. If you weren’t seeking respectful dialogue, what was the point? Just venting? The idea that expecting civil discourse is ‘bad faith’ is genuinely puzzling.

Another lie from the subversive jew.

YOU entered the conversation.

Typical subversive: enters the chat, demands people reply to him, gets hurt when people call them out for their lies.

“See how they cry out as they strike you.”

It’d be sad if you hadn’t been so successful in your manipulations over the past 80 years, but you have been. And now you will deep the whirlwind for your lies and deceit.

You chose to participate in the dialogue. Why do that if you not willing to engage respectfully and patiently? Blowing steam?

I don't know if you've been told, but your people's behavior is no longer funny. Don't give them any more reasons to make "groups".

look @ yourself

Too cryptic. I need you to decipher this for me.

Have I forced you to keep in the dialogue?