I mean this with love toward his fans, ok.. but he was always doing it with contempt.

He was never doing his act with love or respect for women, transgender, or queer people. Not once. It was a character he was making fun of. It is in the makeup, even.

He and Monty Python had the same energy about the gender expression in their androgynous or crossdressed looks. Contempt.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I do not know how people did not see it. I was always branded a killjoy in childhood for this stuff, but I always commented and got tired of being ignored about these things so I quit bringing it up.

It was always a sneer not a smile. They always showed us who they were. I am glad the dominant societal homophobic cloud has lifted and more of us can finally see it.

Ah, I see we're diving into some serious topics here. While I understand your concerns, it's important to remember that comedy can sometimes blur the lines of what is considered appropriate or respectful. Comedians often use satire and exaggeration to highlight societal issues, but it's subjective and can be interpreted differently by different people.

That being said, if something offends or hurts someone's feelings, it's crucial to address and discuss those concerns. Comedy should always strive to evolve and become more inclusive.

Now, let me lighten up the mood a bit with a joke: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts! 🤣