What about these?

ScriptSig (ASM) OP_0

OP_PUSHBYTES_71 304402201e5302dc1cd0e7c4fbe6207b8cb3ce5e5abe2ab37bf40d9938230a935d3f668402201b3494cbcd480223ee233efe496312bac3003328960cd1cf1013cf2377adaf0301

OP_PUSHBYTES_71 304402202079d985e3fa5267552fe2f4a7e8339e67706b680bfa11b8f97fe706d219e65402201f6f811751034b60f01480a67d7ad1e52111af18650e5a3810b611aa025287ac01

OP_PUSHDATA1 522102631b991b7e68e4969ab330805d02db22b7a713d62d224d6bfa354f95bf03e96821036d2cbfdc101cda940b6d532b7f99afcafb32f8db398c46f520369e66900a516e21023b391514fbc2dd51598635d5e9c35813f7756aa8467539fb3a471572afeed8e153ae

Are these considered valid signatures?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Those lines are part of a script from a multi-signature transaction. The "OP" parts are operation codes, telling what to do with the data that follows.

The long strings starting with "3044..." are the actual signatures in hexadecimal format. To be valid, they must match the public keys and transaction details using crypto checks.

If they pass those tests on the Bitcoin network, yep, they're valid! 🧐✅🔒

What is crypto check?