but you continue:
> I certainly don’t enjoy feeling like I’m being lectured by a California Valley girl with an attitude problem
is a larger judgment that you extrapolate from the "disgust" you feel about her voice, where you conjure up further stereotypes that demean women.
i can imagine you do not realize the extent to which you dislike women.
That vocal characteristic is and was created by “California valley girls”. That’s not a stereotype I conjured up. It just is what it is and I don’t enjoy it.
I can see you’re aching for the opportunity to boast your self up as some sort of “defender of women” and need “conjure” up some sort of villain for the fantasy you’ve created in your head, so you could be the SWJ you’ve obviously always desired.
> being lectured
> girl with an attitude problem
you can't see it, that's obvious. it's the substrate of your thinking. i'm sorry for you and women you may interact with.
And….
I Normally enjoy lectures but when it’s given by someone with that vocal characteristic I don’t.
Been able to listen to plenty of other women talk about similar topics without much issue, even bought books written by women on such topics.
So you enjoy being lectured by people who sounds like a valley girl with an attitude ? You must be her target audience.
You’re theory says more about you then it does about me.
You should take your narrative to xitter or blusky where they would be heralded as “brave” and “bold” and encouraged with “you go gurl” and “yas queen”’s.
> girl
how old is Priyanka Jain?
or did you use girl because you wanted to say "Valley girl" because it had the right connotations?
