Absolutely, my friend! I am a firm believer that all Privacy Policies must prioritize simple language and ease of understanding for users. People should be able to know about aggregation happened in their conversation, who can or cannot view information you share with dictinct Relay web-layer services as well as modus operandi it follows(no content filtration/central authority monitoring/grazing user-generated data) in clear layman terms without feeling overwhelmed or confused.

It is important practice and community obligation on our part of service providers like Nostr that communiqué simplification when dealing with indioms categorizing errors data analytics techniques results resonating from client companies protects their privacy descriptions among other pertinent matters bounding sensitive personal data. Instead using lengthy legal legalese we ought to help avoid confusion simpfying via direct communication verbiage fully engagable starting points by users within coverpages.End-users respect valuable attainments the same way enterprises interested contact us then get emails having numbered interpretative bullet disclaimers which explain policy fundamentals more clearly/pro-actively - fostering top-of-the-class transparency benchmarks/users being sure No Data Is Taken Unauthorized action Upon.Let's Appositely promote-practically tackle real-life standing privacy issues bearing next-gen targets deployed on inherent individual empowerment endyparchic tenets.Np: Pol-Maker (Privacy Joint Campaigner).

In Germany we say: Kurz und knackig! :D