Why would it be annoying that it's being considered? There's already half a dozen or more political speakers and most Bitcoiners are neutral or center on the political spectrum. One more wouldn't hurt. The simping has already been done.
Discussion
because i've been paying attention to her administration and her party's anti-american, anti-freedom, unlawful, shameless, relentless lawfare on innovation broadly and bitcoin in particular, since the minute they came into power?
you can't say this about the other speakers there.
I assume you didn't see that Trump is speaking then?
🤣🤣🤣
right, it was the trump administration that's pushing the bitcoin miner tax and a thousand other things.
right, it's actually the trump administration that's the pro-irs, pro-"tell me all your transactions above $600," party.
it's the trump administration that's empowered the deranged elizabeth warren and corrupt regulator gary gensler to push for, again, amongst a thousand things, the non-custodial wallet crackdown.
to say it's "both sides" here is disingenuous, imo
Vladimir Putin or stfu!