Both.
Homoerotic desires is a medical condition of hormone dysregulation and it can be correct with hormones.
Discussion
Yes, just like any impulse it can be avoided or suppressed but it is no more bad or good than any other impulse. Take murderous thoughts about other bad drivers, it is solely acting upon this impulse that can be morally judged. Regardless or the supposed "source" of said impulse, bad driving or hormonal dysregulation.
27“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
Matthew 5:27-28.
Reformed Christians believe that thoughts and impulses are equally as sinful as the actions themselves. No sense in cleaning the outside of the cup if the inside is disgusting. hence Laser’s statements.
I believe that the wave of gayness is actually downstream of manmade hormone pollutants, and that medicine (hormones) could be used to help recover the afflicted.
But we need to overcome the cultural element that accepts faggotry as natural instead of as a condition that should be overcame.
We know what standard hormone profiles looks like, and we know faggots have dysregulated hormones.
Understanding the factors causing this and providing care is the right thing to do.
In simpler terms, who you find sexually attractive has nothing to do with who you are and everything to do with your hormones.
Fix someone's hormones, fix their gayness. Eliminate societal hormone pollutants, eliminate society's unnaturally high tendency to faggotry.
I mean, I didn't suggest that it was who they are. I am talking about a metaphysical concept called thought impulse. Nothing about the chemicals in your brain make you recieve thought impulses. If that was true, I could make you think specific thoughts at certain times. The best they have is patterns of brain wave function. (aggression, sympathy, honesty, and so on) What people think the brain does is widely misunderstood because people have been train to only think in terms of subject object. Read Pirsig, the Dynamic quality is the goal.
I don't believe that at all. I believe there is an absolute difference between attaching oneself to an impulse and having one, forgiving yourself, and letting the thought pass out of your mind.
"Looks after her with lustful INTENT"
That does not sound like an impulse to me. That sounds like he inhabited the idea of having her. I did not say impulses should be fantasized about. They are angels and demons wispering to you. It is your choice to ignore them or be enslaved by them. Either to the extent of fantasy or action.