calling bitcoin permissionless was a mistake

people think it means the authorities haven’t told us we can’t do it, so that means it’s ok

same with nostr, good luck out there

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Touch grass πŸ’šπŸ€™

Ride bicycles give em hell πŸ€£πŸ€™

Of all social media networks I would guess nostr has the highest GDP/capita by some huge margin. And that’s without any ad revenue or corporate monetisation

I know permissionless means you can run the code and connect your node without asking permission.

Also means you can contribute to the code without permission

That's more complicated but yeah.

In this point of view most github development is also

The PRs must be accepted so no

Exactly. This is why Bitcoin is a public blockchain - as well as many others. So Bitcoin is not the only one, and this is bad news for bitcoin-only fans

Bitcoin has other attributes that make it unique.

But yes, a lot of blockchains could be permissionless

They must think anybody on nostr is a satoshi himself 🀣 morons. Where we are merely tech fan boys haha so many donuts consumed hehe

I agree completely with this and speaks to how difficult unwinding that mindset really is πŸ˜”