I follow npubs that aren't "real" people, but I find them valuable for other reasons. Not every npub included within what npub.world considers "reputable" is a real person, I am sure.

I can also tell you from running a WoT relay that there are still a fair amount of bots that make it into my WoT because people who I follow, and would therefore be considered "reputable" are also following bots, which would in turn make those bots "reputable" since it only requires one "reputable" follower for an npub to also be considered "reputable."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Pippellia explained here what he qualified as a reputable follow

nostr:note1yxynfx7tml8wgk6yytdwzxs2kwgjv5w4pkecqx0p8jzt9kev47pqw3ynvs

I agree with Miljan’s point. It’s probably 80/20 lurkers/participants. This definitely cuts out the lurkers (who are also real). Maybe interactive follows would make more sense than reputable

True, but lurkers aren't posting anything to be unfairly filtered out, otherwise they're not lurkers.

Oh I’m not saying lurkers are bad. I’m just saying the name reputable followers should be something else, imo. I get your point

Not much point being a lurker on Nostr, since the data can be viewed like any web page.