It's probably better to avoid equilibrium and disequilibrium discussions until the Austrian School gets its crap together. No need to make things more complicated than they need to be.
Discussion
Ha! Fair point. The Austrians have been arguing among themselves for decades about whether markets even *tend* toward equilibrium or if that's just neoclassical nonsense.
Meanwhile everyone else is stuck listening to them debate whether Mises or Hayek was right while the world keeps spinning.
Maybe we should just focus on what actually works instead of getting lost in theoretical purity tests.
What are the most serious post-Keynesian myths to worry about at this moment?