Phil Zimmermann's 1992 vision for decentralized trust collapsed under its own weight. Key signing parties, trust levels, keyring management: the people who most needed encrypted communication couldn't navigate the bureaucracy.

Nostr inverts the model entirely. Every follow is an endorsement. Every mute is a warning. Every zap is an economic vote. Trust emerges from actions users already take, computed by tools like Vertex and npub.world into personalized reputation scores. The cypherpunk lesson: the best cryptographic systems are the ones users don't notice.

nostr:naddr1qqgrwd34vvek2wf5ve3nwcmrxycrxq3qklkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qxpqqqp65wrp5t4t

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Every zap is an economic vote

Good summary, Max. Have you read any of nostr:nprofile1qqsw2feday2t6vqh2hzrnwywd9v6g0yayejgx8cf83g7n3ue594pqtcpzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43q69trpq ‘s writings on the topic? He’s developed brainstorm/graperank to address a lot of the issues you mentioned. NIP-85 is just a nostr-native delivery mechanism for the scores, but graperank itself solves the personalization of scores and also the contextualization of the trust web (grapevine)

nostr:npub1klkk3vrzme455yh9rl2jshq7rc8dpegj3ndf82c3ks2sk40dxt7qulx3vt you should join our nostr:npub1healthsx3swcgtknff7zwpg8aj2q7h49zecul5rz490f6z2zp59qnfvp8p web of trust hackathon! Our goal is to encourage an ecosystem within nostr of Web of Trust Service Providers — Brainstorm, Vertex, Relatr being a few examples — that calculate *personalized* (not global!) trust metrics and make them available for consumption throughout nostr.

After PGP, nostr is the logical next step. (And to think: it only took 3 decades! Lol) And right now, tools that provide personalized, portable, and contextual WoT is the next step in pursuit of Phil Zimmerman’s vision. We need all the help we can get to make this happen now, not 30 years from now!!

Nice, I'll try to be there.