It's also about power/control.
Here is a study that looks at the temperature data being take. Most of the temp data is in urban areas which are significantly warmer than the rural Station. And states it cannot be stated with any degree of certainty what is causing the warming (human or other)
Study: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/11/9/179
Darkhorse podcast explaining it: https://rumble.com/v3is5gz-climate-models-urban-areas-solar-activity-and-consensus-from-livestream-191.html
And of course urban areas will be warmer. And the models bias the urban data.
well i didn't read it, just looked at the charts and it looks like the temperature is rising so the climate is changing?
Yes...it is saying temperatures are rising even in rural areas...but the the urban centers are like 50%(if I remember) higher.
Indicates that the climate alarmists (i.e climate apocalypse types) are being less than accurate and talking more concretely than they should.
And all the models/peer reviewed papers are biased on the higher number, which is scientifically dishonest.
Also the paper indicates that one one has looked at the solar activities and it's impact on temp.
The scientists are just assuming there is no significant impact, without any evidence.
For a scientist to say with any degree of certainty that it is mostly humans is not being scientific and is just spouting an opinion.
