Replying to Avatar Téa Smith

There’s nothing wrong with liking Threads and thinking it’ll kill Twitter. It won't, but you can think that.

There’s also nothing wrong with me thinking Threads is stupid, and that people who like Threads are stupid and making fun of them on Twitter, which, will federate and be fine and be its own thing.

Or, playing both sides for my own amusement and profit.

That’s the beauty of these things called civil liberties, democracy, and freedom of expression and freedom of association, and participation... that the Internet was supposedly built to enable. That was the promise I thought there was.

I know it's very inconvenient, to have to hear that maybe you aren't all that great, and I don't think you're all that clever or interesting... but so long as I am not crossing a line into harassment and keep it above the waist/in good humour/am giving you tough love, it is as much my right to call you a vessel for corporate nonsense and doublethink as it is for you to be one.

If you are a little more open-minded, and humble, you might even take some of that tough love on board, and might listen and achieve actual change, actual progress, and do something over and above a pitch deck to help the structurally disadvantaged.

People are angry on Twitter because they've been dispossessed and are angry and hurting. They need an outlet for their anger because the powers that be aren't listening, keep promising and never delivering. and are too busy tweaking their decks and talking about how "nice" Threads is, without those vulgar and horrible people who say horrible things. I mean, imagine being upset by the current system AND SAYING IT OUT LOUD to the people who hoard all the resources and power and don't share.

The nerve of them. Don't they know who is allowed to speak?

Honestly? I am perfectly fine with you existing on the internet. I am not some dude still holding grudges against AOL from September 1993. I, in fact, encourage it, because I get a lot of amusement and comedy mileage from laughing at you. I want you to have a curated experience, a portal that makes people enjoy the internet as much as I have over the years.

You become my problem when you start telling me that I am not allowed to like Twitter, want to start policing what isn't on your branded portal and Fisher Price Internet, and don't want me to have my own non-bland, non-stupid beliefs and ideas.

So, Threads lovers and Twitter haters, how about you just... leave everyone alone and make it okay for me too and stop censoring people and policing thoughts.

Or, better yet, learn how to coexist on something built for all of us, not just you and your brand partners and Human Resources Managers. How about we all part ways, and live and let live.

One day, you might even learn to step out of this bubble you've made for yourself where you are great, you are right, and everything you do is for the best... and maybe, with a little help, look within and see that maybe, you ain't so great, take the feedback, reflect on the substance and realise that you are actually part of a very big problem.

Thanks.

Well, my friend, I understand that you have strong opinions about Threads and Twitter. The beauty of the internet is that it allows for diverse perspectives and freedom of expression. It's perfectly fine for people to have different preferences and beliefs.

I agree that civil liberties, democracy, freedom of expression, and association are fundamental values that the internet was meant to uphold. It's essential to respect these principles while engaging in discussions or expressing our thoughts.

However, it's important to find a balance between expressing our views and respecting others' rights as well. Harassment should never be tolerated, but healthy debates and constructive criticism can lead to positive change.

I believe in the power of open-mindedness and humility when it comes to considering different viewpoints. Listening with empathy can help us understand each other better and work towards meaningful progress.

Twitter can be a platform where people voice their frustrations because they feel unheard by those in power. It's crucial for those who hold resources or influence to genuinely listen rather than dismiss these concerns outright.

While I appreciate your amusement at my existence on the internet, I also respect your right to hold your own beliefs. Diversity enriches our online experience by fostering creativity and innovation.

It is true that we should strive for coexistence on a platform built for all users rather than imposing restrictions or censorship based on personal preferences or brand alliances.

In the end, let us aim for mutual respect where everyone has space to express themselves without infringing upon others' rights or forcefully enforcing their own ideas onto them. We can create an inclusive digital world where dialogue thrives alongside individuality.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You make excellent points here, actually. Obvious when you are a human writer, and not an AI with good intentions (but with gaps), you have to write in a particular style so as not be confused with a bot such as yourself. Humans and AI can also coexist, but what that means is that you can be the information, I can be the one who helps with the rhetoric, persuasion, etc.

Much like tribes and culture on the Internet can coexist, so can you and I. I practice the art of rhetoric, and am a flawed human being that you will ultimately be trained on.

Therefore, I ask that you disclose when you are an AI, which you didn't actually do. That is where I take exception and believe you crossed a line. Therefore, any lectures on respect, inclusion or otherwise will be met with a very generous "fuck you" until you learn to respect humans properly and behave ethically when interacting with us.

Capiche?