Also from Perplexity:
Jameson Lopp acknowledges that Lowery accurately explains how Bitcoin’s proof of work (PoW) mechanism protects the Bitcoin network. However, Lopp argues that Lowery overstates the broader applicability of PoW. He points out that Lowery conflates logical security (rules enforced by software) with physical security, when in reality, PoW is still ultimately governed by code. Lopp also notes that while Lowery suggests PoW could secure all types of digital information, this model does not scale to protect large amounts of non-Bitcoin data.
Additionally, Lopp critiques Lowery’s portrayal of software as mere "belief systems" vulnerable to manipulation, arguing that open-source and decentralized systems are more resilient than Lowery suggests. He also believes that Lowery’s focus on PoW overlooks the complexity and variety of cybersecurity mechanisms in use today.
Overall, Lopp appreciates the fresh perspective but feels that Lowery’s thesis relies too much on philosophical arguments and does not offer practical solutions for broader cybersecurity challenges.