So basically you have free speech as long as you don't say the wrong things. Nice, by that definition every single country in human history has had free speech. North Korea has free speech according to your definition. You can say what you want, it's physically possible, you'll just have to suffer the consequences for it.
Discussion
North Koreans do have a natural right of free speech... Everyone does. That's what rights are. The US is the only place that has a constitutional protection for speech. That still doesn't mean threats of violence is free speech. It's a pretty easy line to draw. You don't have to obfuscate it to make your argument look better.
You're retarded and moving the goal post.
I don't think so... Your counter to what I said is "you're retarded" what did I say that was wrong?
Saying "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" is an utterly retarded thing to say. As I correctly pointed out. You then try to move the conversation towards violent threats which makes you retarded.
What's retarded is not changing your opinion of someone based on things they say. So say some old racist person slings the n word everywhere in public. I'm not supposed to judge his character because freedom of speech? That's pretty fucking retarded. So when someone says "I hate Palestinians", Gaza should let them in because freedom of speech? Don't act like you live by anyone can say anything and I don't pass judgements based on their speech. That's not what you do. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you get to decide how other people have to feel about that speech. It's not an argument. It's just reality. Present a counter to that.