Replying to Avatar Carl T. Bergstrom

A common misconception about academic life is that once a professor has tenure, they can simply coast and have no incentive to do otherwise.

This might be true if salaries were guaranteed for 12 months. They rarely are. For example, the UW pays 2/3 of my salary. I raise the other 1/3 on grant funding, or I don't get paid.

So when I write a multiyear grant, I may have a year's salary riding on a proposal where to be funded I have to be ranked above 90% of other, similarly motivated faculty.
Avatar
jonny (good kind) 2y ago

nostr:npub16nf96938l0uqz4j6kw0m9w60h368yklusr9wmrrx9xy8v5yuhd6qu4q6as

totally. what baffles me is how this doesn't also result in faculty unions being the most radical unions in academia. every part of being a professor seems shrouded in bullshit that is actually a labor issue. soft money, institutional grant overhead, shitty administrators, broken systems, and so on. you'd think an exceptionally highly motivated group of ppl that do have pretty strong protections against being fired would use that to fight against the bullshit that makes their jobs suck, in the process pushing back the corporatization of the rest of the institutions that harms the rest of the students and workers.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
jonny (good kind) 2y ago

nostr:npub16nf96938l0uqz4j6kw0m9w60h368yklusr9wmrrx9xy8v5yuhd6qu4q6as

I mean I have my theories, like those who become professors having survivors bias against a system that is designed to reward individual accomplishment instead of collective benefit, but I still don't get it.