Saylor has done a lot to push and validate bitcoin to the mainstream but people need to treat him as what he is. His intentions are not to facilitate the revolution we are seeking but just capitalize in bitcoin's inevitable monetary superiority.

He is not seeking to revolutionize the system that made him rich - it works for him! And he has publicly talked down about the cypherpunk ethos that birthed bitcoin. He is looking to at bitcoin as a captured asset. We need to thank him, keep his involvement in the space - because hyperbitconization does not happen without the traditional financial system being included - but notch him down a few levels. We should be giving this treatment to people who are looking to maintain and develop bitcoin as freedom money.

Anybody else has a different perspective? #bitcoin #asknostr #plebchain

nostr:nevent1qqstny9qdlev6r0u43vmndnq6879p36xfpxde68kxctukh6j379cwdgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhg0agmwe

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Isn’t everyone?

Isn't everyone what?

Trying to get rich!

Ah, got it. Yes, who doesn't want to. But the difference-makers focus on the revolution that will raise all boats and propel human civilization forward vs the fiat mindset of just capturing and subjugating whatever is needed to be the richest of them all.