What do you think
Discussion
I think there's zero chance that all of the following are true:
1) Measles is a deadly disease caused by exposure to a single microorganism too small to be imaged (at all, ever) by a light microscope.
2) People who are sick with measles produce trillions of individual measles-causing microorganisms and spread them into the environment.
3) Despite (1) & (2), we're not all already dead.
4) Despite (2), the measles-causing microorganism has never been isolated from a sick host.
5) Despite (4), somehow an injection was developed that uniquely protects against the measles-causing microorganism.
6) The injection in (5) is completely safe.
My conclusion
The injection is not completely (100%) safe but it is safer than not taking it.
The injection is actually 99.9999999999% safe and getting measle will make you extremely sick.
That injection, in my opinion, is modern medecine.
I chose to benefit from modern medecine
I will always fight for your right to not benefit from modern medecine
But you believe what I describe as points 1-3?
How is that even possible?
I don't know about your point 1 and 2.
3 Measles kills people. There is a child in West Texas that died recently.
We already know it does not kill everyone but it kills some people. And if it does not kill you, you are sick as hell.
How do you know that the measles-causing microorganism killed the child in West Texas?
The television said so?
The news. Very likely true
That news is very likely true.
How (in general) would you determine that a sub-microscopic entity caused someone to die?
Would you get some of these sub-microscopic entities separate from everything else and then characterize their behavior?
Or would you mix them with lots and lots of other things and assume that whatever happens is because of these sub-microscopic entities?