we do not all define peace in the same way - social prosperity is not tranquil, but it brings security and vibrancy in its robustness. this is often messy and loud. but it is not dangerous. when the definition of danger is adjusted toward people believing any disagreement is a threat to "peace" discussion ceases, policy stalls, and innovation vaults in all ways which are considered threatening. i'm a liberal and a democrat because i believe policy should be concrete and applicable, not simply discursive and theoretical. actualisation is true progress. talking about what happened and why it was "dangerous" ad nauseam does nothing but stoke fear.