Well stated, training will peak, at least until a decent trade off is achieved for local models.

Composable, hyper specialized AIs offering services to other AIs seem like the direction.

"Additionally, a new fast growing class of “organisms” (i.e. intelligent LLM or AI Agents) are unable to easily gain access to fiat systems of payment as they aren’t registered “entities” with any nation. However, these agents will certainly need to pay for resources whether from gated APIs or paid sources of data. Plus, they will need to be able to effectively evaluate pricing signals to determine the most efficient path to accomplish a task. These payments, evaluations, and decisions will lead to thousands of AI agents making countless micro-payments and micro-decisions a day. Given these factors, it makes sense the creators of AI agents will ultimately gravitate towards a globally available, permissionless, near-instantly settled internet native monetary system in Bitcoin and Lightning rather than the traditional fiat system which simply cannot support these types of payments or evaluations"

https://lightning.engineering/posts/2023-07-05-l402-langchain/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think agents will have to be owned, or our legal system will fall over pretty quickly.

But law of the jungle (I’m gonna start using this term a lot more), will eventually win out and systems will have to be resilient to operating under jungle law (no law at all).

Local AI, is a lot like the second amendment. It’s a check on unchecked power and I think it will be inevitable that early proliferation will make local AI ubiquitous.

Bitcoin works under jungle law and so does nostr. Permissionless tech is really going to become more necessary, but we are probably 15 years early here? I am often too early on these sort of things.

Super hard to predict this stuff, but it probably pays to have high conviction here and just be in the right place indefinitely and just wait for the right time.