As I was mentioning in this note: note1yst27jnugn5fjuza4nt5e7fuqrcujjjsxv6yqw2740tuaxvav9rqjlm2md
Here is the debunking article of the Nazca #alien mummy from Snopes.com: https://web.archive.org/web/20230913101302/https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alien-mummy-peru/
And here is the paragraph from the article that quote the source of the debunking:
« In 2015, Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, who reported the existence of the Nazca mummy to Gaia and is featured in the video, led an event called Be Witness, at which a mummified body — purportedly that of an alien — was unveiled. Later, though, that "alien" discovery was debunked, and the mummified corpse was shown to be that of a human child. »
The paragraph links to the source article: https://web.archive.org/web/20230727182625/http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2015/05/tony-bragalia-and-end-of-roswell-slides.html
The source article discuss about the « Roswell alien slides » which has no connexion to the Nazca alien mummy that the Snopes article has supposedly debunked. It’s unclear why the source article mentions a totally unrelated event. I went go back through the original versions of wayback machine and I couldn’t find a version that mentions the Nazca mummy. Wayback machine has been caught in the past to alter some results but it’s unclear to me what happened with this article.
Why would Snopes.com reference this article to debunk the Nazca mummy? I have no idea but obviously this can’t be called a debunking. If I have to guess it looks like an another attempt at debunking an info by gaslighting the reader.
As I said, I’ve only done cursory research on the topic but I’ve since looked a bit more into it and I can’t find other sources presenting a credible debunking of the Nazca #alien mummy. Obviously, I’m open to contradictory evidence but as it stands saying that those #aliens are fake because Maussan had been caught cheating in the past doesn’t seem to be supported by any evidence and that’s sadly what the USA Today article does…
#UFO
Thanks for this, i initially dimissed it because on twitter people i thought were mexican said they knew him to be part of a previous hoax. But if the claims about the hoax itself are unfounded, wow. People in the north look down on mexico, but i know how seriously they take their state and offices. Many reports said it was a reveal BY the government, rather than TO the gov, in a hearing type setting. The University endorsement is wild if true.
I did not know that about wayback machine, useful info, but sad. Really 1984 stuff lately.
Anyways, thx again, i'll send you some sats when i get that set up.
Thread collapsed
