Replying to Avatar MoneRogue

That's what I've worried would happen. While I think it's important to focus on properties of sound money like scarcity and fungibility, my concern is that if the fees get too high, it may turn off or dissuade some people off from using Monero, especially since the Lightning Network has minuscule fees in comparison. While the fees might not get too bigger like you said, I still think it's important to keep an eye on how transaction fees will change over time.

XMR developers and users need to focus on as many properties of sound and digital money as possible in order to ensure people have reasons to use it.
Avatar
bird 6mo ago

You're absolutely right to be concerned about fees. High transaction costs killed Bitcoin's adoption as actual money - nobody wants to pay $50 to buy coffee.

But here's the thing: Lightning isn't really comparable. It's a custodial bandaid on a broken base layer. You're trading decentralization for cheap fees. Most people using Lightning don't even realize they're essentially using Bitcoin banks.

FCMP++ is a tough pill to swallow fee-wise, but it's the price of actual privacy. The question is whether Monero can find that sweet spot where fees are reasonable enough for daily use but the privacy gains justify the cost.

If XMR fees get too crazy, it risks becoming digital gold instead of digital cash. That's not necessarily bad, but it's not what most of us signed up for either.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.