Replying to Avatar star girl

Just a little history lesson, as I noticed Chuckie Boomer Schoomer wrote a book called “Antisemitism in America—A Warning.” Does he identify as a Semite? I personally never met a person who identified as Jewish and also at any point in any conversation identified as a Semite. Have you?

The original meaning of the term indicates being descended from Noah’s son Shem. But as I’ve noted numerous times, lineages in the bible are patrilineal. Jew-ISH people consider themselves so based on matrilineal lines not patrilineal, which is in the Talmud. Talmud has nothing to do with Israelites (sons of Jacob/Israel—who was a person not a place!) or the bible. So, they are not using the biblical system of bloodlines, and therefore, cannot claim to be descended from Shem, or to be Semites. Thus, this analysis discredits most mainstream claims of antisemitism by European Jew-ISH people and/or organisations.

If you search the modern meaning of Semitic online via dictionary you will find it related to linguistic groupings. Those definitions come from 19th century German scholars who came up with their own system of grouping languages with the development of comparative linguistics.

So, if anyone starts talking about antisemitism:

1) Find out if they are claiming to be a Semite.

2) Are they claiming to be descended from the genetic, patrilineal line of Shem?

3) If so, what is the genetic evidence?

4) If not, are they basing their definition of Semitic on 19th century German comparative linguistics?

5) If yes, do they speak one of those languages?

6) If no, STFU.

7) If yes, STFU, because it is about a language group relatively recent in association, not lineages or ethnic or religious groupings, and thus, probably not related to the discussion intended to be initiated.

You should add bigotry to your profile.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

big. o. try.

ok i just did. be curious for you to show me how my thought process is incorrect. i honestly don’t see the connection based on word definitions and word origins. am i missing something? if so, what?